¶1This cause is before us on appeal of appellants’ convictions and sentences for grand theft. Although we affirm the convictions, we remand as to both appellants for hearings to determine the amount of restitution each must pay. McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); James v. State, 499 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
542 So. 2d 452
Black v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 28, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-04-28
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1994
3 state decisions
Relies on 520 So. 2d 664 - McCaskill v. State · 499 So. 2d 24 - James v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-04-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →