Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 So. 2d 458 - Hampton v. State

542 So. 2d 458 - Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · Adams v. State · 338 So. 2d 874 - Tunsil v. State · Coachman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] defendant cannot escape the penalties for an act which in point of fact produces death, which death might possibly have been averted by some possible mode of treatment. The true doctrine is that, where the wound is in itself dangerous to life, mere erroneous treatment of it or of the wounded man suffering from it will afford the defendant no protection against the charge of unlawful homicide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.