Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

542 So. 2d 473

542 So.2d 473

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1102

Barberi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-05-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1990

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This cause is before us on appeal of restitution orders entered pursuant to appellant’s five criminal convictions. We must remand in order that the trial court specify the amount of restitution in the five sentencing orders. As to three of the offenses, the amounts are set out in the presentence investigation report and need only be transcribed into the orders. For two of the cases, however, restitution amounts were not specified in the presen-tence investigation report, and a hearing is required to set the amounts.

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
/542/so2d/473 · .json · Public domain