Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

542 So. 2d 475

542 So.2d 475

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1103

Coyle v. Western Union

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-05-04

Relies on 469 So. 2d 786 - Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2002

4 state decisions

20198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1There were two hearings conducted in this worker’s compensation cause, one on March 3, 1988, and a second on July 13, 1988. As a result of those hearings, one final compensation order was entered. In preparing the transcript of the record on appéal, the deputy commissioner determined that the tapes for the July 13 hearing were missing. This court relinquished jurisdiction to the deputy commissioner so that the parties could attempt to reconstruct the record on appeal. The deputy commissioner has now certified to this court that the record of the proceedings contained on the lost tapes cannot be reconstructed.

¶2Appellees now file a motion to limit the new trial to matters raised in the July 13, 1988, hearing. The motion to limit the new trial is denied. The final order of the deputy commissioner is vacated and the cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
/542/so2d/475 · .json · Public domain