State v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably State v. Barber (1982), 30 Mass. App. Ct. 490 - Commonwealth v. James (1991)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Wiley · State v. Thomas · State v. Stuart · State v. Dowling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here the defendant did not remain silent, but made oral answers to Detective Smith's questions, a part of which was incriminating, ie., 'it was just some old, homegrown stuff This was volunteered in conjunction with his indication that he didn't desire to talk. Clearly the reference to 'homegrown stuff was incriminating and constituted an admission against interest. The defendant was fully advised of his rights prior to the questioning by Smith and admitted that he had been so advised and understood those rights. There is no showing or claim by the defendant that he was tricked or coerced into making the admission. A voluntary statement or admission by an accused while under arrest and after being fully advised of his rights is admissible, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Gregg v. State, 446 S.W.2d 630, 632 [1, 2] (Mo.1969), and being a voluntary admission against interest, it was properly admitted in evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hardy“After I asked him if he knew why he was in jail, he stated, 'Yes, for possession of marihuana.' I asked if he'd been advised of his rights under Miranda. He stated he had and signed the papers. He understood them. I asked if he wanted to go upstairs and talk to me in regard to the situation. He stated, 'No, it was just some old, homegrown stuff. And he didn't wish to talk to me. U”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hardy“he was merely expressing his desire not to talk and to remain silent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hardy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.