Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 U.S. 177 - Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Humboldt County et al.

Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Humboldt County et al.’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

1,235
cited by 1,235 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
39
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

321 federal appellate · 82 district · 538 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,235 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Davis v. Washington (2006), Illinois v. Caballes (2005)

321 federal appellate · 82 district · 538 state decisions — followed in 39 states

6560200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California

Cited together with Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Illinois v. Wardlow · Florida v. Bostick · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,235 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To qualify for the Fifth Amendment privilege, a communication must be testimonial, incriminating, and compelled.”
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “In the ordinary course a police officer is free to ask a person for identification without implicating the Fourth Amendment.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[o]btaining a suspect's name in the course of a Terry stop serve[d] important government interests”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.