Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
130 federal appellate · 87 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 579 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales (2006), Schmitz v. Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP (2004)
130 federal appellate · 87 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp. (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1696 · 28 U.S.C. § 1782 · 42 U.S.C. § 7511
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Thomas v. Arn · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Cupp v. Naughten · Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 579 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the nature of the foreign tribunal, the character of the proceedings underway abroad, and the receptivity of the foreign government or the court or agency abroad to U.S. federal-court judicial assistance”
68 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the request must be made “by a foreign or international tribunal,” or by “any interested person”; (2) the request must seek evidence, whether it be the “testimony or statement” of a person or the production of “a document or other thing”; (3) the evidence must be “for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal”; and (4) the person from whom discovery is sought must reside or be found in the district of the district court ruling on the application for assistance.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“the person from whom discovery is sought is a participant in the foreign proceeding,”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.