Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 542 U.S. 426 - Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense v. Padilla et al.

Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense v. Padilla et al.’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

1,043
cited by 1,043 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

197 federal appellate · 237 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,043 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Boumediene v. Bush (2008), Jennings v. Rodriguez (2018)

197 federal appellate · 237 district · 15 state decisions

6000200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPadilla v. Rumsfeld (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 951 · 18 U.S.C. § 3144 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 4001 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Carafas v. J · Jones v. Cunningham · United States v. Hayman · Kontrick v. Ryan · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky

Cited together with Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Ex parte Endo · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,043 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ur understanding of custody has broadened to include restraints short of physical confinement[.]”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the person who has custody over [the petitioner].” 28 U.S.C. § 2242 ; see also § 2243 (”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the warden of the facility where the prisoner is being held,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.