Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

543 F.2d 1155

Docket No. 75-1609.

Smith v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 13, 1976.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1976-12-13

Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1978

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Richard D. Morelan and Margaret Morelan, United States of America v. Karl W. Christey · United States v. Daniel F. Barrett and Margaret G. Barrett Edgar B. Garner and Evelyn T. Garner · Wilson v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1976-12-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Gilbert E. Andrews, Acting Chief, Appellate Section, William A. Friedlander, Alfred S. Lombardi, Dept, of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant.

¶2B. G. Perry, Southaven, Miss., Ben H. Stone, Gulfport, Miss., Charles E. Marx, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.

¶3Before COLEMAN, GODBOLD and HILL, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Plaintiffs, a Mississippi highway patrolman and wife, sued for a refund of income taxes for 1972. The government included in income cash payments received by the husband to reimburse him for the cost of meals eaten while on duty. Plaintiffs claimed the payments were excludible under § 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The district court granted a refund, relying on U. S. v. Barrett, 321 F.2d 911 (C.A.5, 1963). The government concedes that Barrett controls unless reversed.

¶6*1156We affirm on the basis of Barrett. Accord, U. S. v. Morelan, 356 F.2d 199 (C.A.8, 1966); Keeton v. U. S., 383 F.2d 429 (C.A.10,1967). Contra, Wilson v. U. S., 412 F.2d 694 (C.A.1, 1969).

¶7AFFIRMED.

/543/f2d/1155 · .json · Public domain