Dummar v. Lummis’s Empirical Analysis
543 F.3d 614 · 2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2024
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Agency Holding Corporation v. Malley-Duff & Associates Inc Crown Life Insurance Company · Rotella v. Wood · Klehr v. Ao Smith Corporation Ao
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e see nothing improper in the representations of the Gays to this court in their motion for substitution, so Mr. Dummar’s motions to strike the joint brief and oral argument of Defendants and for a stay are DENIED.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Estate of Gay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.