Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 543 N.E.2d 1141 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hammons v. State · Page v. State · Abercrombie v. State · Lawrence v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) identify the significant mitigating and aggravating circumstances found; (2) state the facts and reasons which lead the court to find each circumstance; and (3) demonstrate that the circumstances have been balanced in determining the sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “failed to make any statement whatsoever when rendering Pearson's sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.