State v. Oanes’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2019
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morgan v. United States · Rath Packing Co. Creditors' Trust v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Martin v. Wainwright · State v. Webb · Uselman v. Uselman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the legislature has not defined `intimate parts' in the prostitution statutes, we must construe the words according to common usage. A woman's breasts are commonly considered a sexual and intimate part of her body... The legislature enacted the current criminal sexual conduct statutes before the present prostitution sections, and grouped them under the common heading”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A defendant must raise an entrapment defense by establishing by a fair preponderance of the evidence that a government actor initiated the criminal idea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garcia“thus indicating sex crimes, including prostitution, encompass acts of touching another person's breasts under certain conditions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.