Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 543 SO2D 1374 - Stuka v. Fleming

Stuka v. Fleming’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Felix v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. · Robertson v. Penn · Williams on Behalf of Williams v. Kushner · 534 So. 2d 1331 - Kelty v. Brumfield · 470 So. 2d 941 - Simon v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fundamental fairness requires that the Fund, forced into the litigation to respond for excess damages, should also be afforded the right to request a trial by jury in defending against such claims”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.