543 So. 2d 252 - Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2006
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 494 So. 2d 1143 - Lambrix v. State · Harris v. State · 424 So. 2d 758 - Hicks v. State · 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a 50/50 split of marital assets is not required, [it] is a good starting point.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The trial court has a very broad ambit of discretion in resolving issues raised in dissolution cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lapham v. Lapham“[T]he choice of dates to value marital assets is largely up to the trial judge's discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.