¶1AFFIRMED. We believe the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction. In addition, on the evidence presented, we believe a reasonable jury could have found that appellant’s alleged theory of the case did not present a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Berriel v. State, 524 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We also find no reversible error in the other issues raised on appeal,
543 So. 2d 290
543 So.2d 290
14 Fla.L.Weekly 1032
Edwards v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 26, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-04-26
Relies on 524 So. 2d 1147 - Berriel v. State
Decided 1989-04-26