¶1Having concluded that the matters presented herein are controlled by Gipson v. State, 537 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) and Walker v. State, 514 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987) and that defendants’ motion to suppress should have been granted, we reverse.
543 So. 2d 415
Crooms v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 17, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-05-17
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1993
3 state decisions
Relies on 537 So. 2d 1080 - Gipson v. State · 514 So. 2d 1149 - Walker v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-05-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →