Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

543 So. 2d 428

543 So.2d 428

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1231

Chandler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-05-18

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2018

12 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAUKSCH, Judge.

¶1This is an appeal from a conviction in a drug case. Appellant’s attorney filed an Anders1 brief and appellant then filed a pro se brief. Neither brief brings up anything to warrant reversal but the pro se brief does raise a competency of counsel issue which must first be directed to the trial judge under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

¶2AFFIRMED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/543/so2d/428 · .json · Public domain