¶1The circuit court erred in summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief without holding an evidentiary hearing or attaching to its order that portion of the record which conclusively demonstrates that appellant is entitled to no relief. See Gentry v. State, 464 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED.