Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 543 SO2D 719 - Rogers v. State

Rogers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ross · United States v. Dunn · Maryland v. Garrison · Weatherford v. Bursey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “).3 But in 1987, the Supreme Court set forth a more narrow definition of a curtilage: [C]urtilage questions should be resolved with particular reference to four factors: the proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home, whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home, the nature of the uses to which the area is put, and the steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by. Dunn, 480 U.S. at 301 . These factors do not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he primary focus is whether the area in question harbors those intimate activities associated with domestic life and the privacies of the home.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “'curtilage' does not include neighboring or nearby property which is beyond the property lines of the dwelling specified in the warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.