Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

543 So. 2d 847

543 So.2d 847

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1211

Singletary v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-05-17

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2014

5 state decisions

Relies on 519 So. 2d 618 - Mays v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon consideration of the several appellate points we affirm defendant’s conviction because no reversible error has been demonstrated. However, we reverse that portion of the judgment imposing costs on the defendant because defendant was not afforded notice and an opportunity to be heard at the time of such assessment. We remand for a new hearing thereon after notice to the defendant. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988).

¶2Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions as concerns the imposition of costs.

DELL, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
/543/so2d/847 · .json · Public domain