Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 543 S.W.2d 653 - Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2009

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

701976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. State · Barrientez v. State · Ex Parte Dickey · Suarez v. State · Mears v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the case at bar, the revocation hearing and the trial for the offense of felony theft occurred before the same judge on the same day. Appellant was also represented by the same counsel during the entire course of the proceedings. Green v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 528 S.W.2d 617 ; Barrientez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 500 S. W.2d 474 . It was not improper for the trial court to revoke the appellant’s probation on the basis of his guilty plea to the offense of felony theft .... ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . Possession of any amount of this substance is a felony of the second degree. Our situation is distinguishable from those cases where the amount of the substance possessed by the accused determines whether the offense is a felony or a misdemeanor. . . . ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.