Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 543 SW2D 99 - Ex Parte Dickey

Ex Parte Dickey’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably Blanco v. State (2000), Monreal v. State (2003)

26 state decisions

11019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Young · Bedell v. State · Bennett v. State · Adams v. State · Reed v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““COMES NOW DEFENDANT, and having been convicted herein, defendant knows he is entitled to ten (10) days in which to file a Motion for New Trial and Motion in Arrest of Judgment, and that he has a right to appeal said conviction to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and Defendant waives his rights to said ten days period, waives his rights to file a Motion for New Trial, and Motion in Arrest of Judgment, and waives his right to appeal this conviction. Defendant prays that he be sentenced forthwith. /s/ Michael H. O’Brien ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT /s/ Thomas Bailev DEFENDANT “The above Waiver of the ten day period to file a Motion for New Trial and Motion in Arrest of Judgment, and Waiver of filing Motion for New Trial and Motion in Arrest of Judgment, and Defendant's Waiver of his Right to Appeal are hereby in all things approved by the Court. /s/ Zimmerman JUDGE” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . When an appellant makes a voluntary and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal at the time of sentencing, such waiver is effective unless and until a timely notice of appeal is filed. . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.