Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 A2D 1272 - State v. Ingalls

State v. Ingalls’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Harrington v. California · United States v. Hasting · Anderson v. Nelson · State v. Barry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The complete absence of evidence tending to show that [defendant] could not have committed the crime, the meager amount of evidence which, if believed, would tend to show that it was unlikely that he did so when viewed against the evidence pointing toward guilt ... satisfy us beyond a reasonable doubt that the prosecutor’s ill-advised comment was, in fact, harmless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although in Tibbetts we articulated the standard as whether beyond a reasonable doubt the evidence would not support acquittal, it is now apparent from Supreme Court cases decided in the 15 years after Tibbetts that the appropriate focus is whether on the record before us the prosecutorial comment through error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.