Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 F.2d 1291 - In the Matter of First Colonial Corp. Of America, Bankrupt. American Benefit Life Insurance Company, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Franz J. Baddock, Trustee, Appellee-Cross-Appellant. In the Matter of First Colonial Corp. Of America, Bankrupt. Bert K. Robinson v. American Benefit Life Insurance Company

In the Matter of First Colonial Corp. Of America, Bankrupt. American Benefit Life Insurance Company, Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Franz J. Baddock, Trustee, Appellee-Cross-Appellant. In the Matter of First Colonial Corp. Of America, Bankrupt. Bert K. Robinson v. American Benefit Life Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis

544 F.2d 1291 · 1977

Citation profile

463
cited by 463 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

113 federal appellate · 16 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 463 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Norman v. Housing Authority of Montgomery (1988), 785 F.2d 1249

113 federal appellate · 16 district ·

2450197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Ross v. Bernhard · Trustees v. Greenough · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co. · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 463 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the time and labor expended; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised; (3) the skill required to properly perform the legal services rendered; (4) the attorney’s opportunity costs in pressing the instant litigation; (5) the customary fee for like work; (6) the attorney’s expectations at the outset of the litigation; (7) the time limitations imposed by the client or circumstances; (8) the amount in controversy and the results obtained; (9) the experience, reputation and ability of the attorney; (10) the undesirability of the case within the legal community in which the suit arose; (11) the nature and length of the professional relationship between attorney and client; and (12) attorneys’ fees awards in similar cases.”
    49 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Ascertain the nature and extent of the services supplied by the attorney; (2) Value the services according to the customary fee and quality of the legal work; (3) Adjust the compensation on the basis of other Johnson factors that may be of significance in the particular case.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “explain the findings and reasons upon which the award is based, including an indication of how each of the twelve factors in Johnson affected his decision”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.