Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 F.2d 1340 - Walters v. Clement

Walters v. Clement’s Empirical Analysis

544 F.2d 1340 · 1977

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 2001
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · 311 So. 2d 104 - State v. Ecker · 337 So. 2d 977 - Spears v. State · 293 So. 2d 33 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “habeas corpus is a peculiarly unsatisfactory means for attacking a statute on the ground of facial unconstitutionally”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.