Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

544 F.2d 934

Docket No. 76-8183.

McCall v. Cudd

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1976-09-17

Relies on United States v. Haley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-09-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2011

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

4019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Before LAY, HEANEY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Burnie McCall filed this original action requesting a writ of mandamus directing the United States Magistrate for the District of Minnesota, J. Earl Cudd, to add certain parties as party-defendants for the purpose of equitable discovery.

¶1

Upon the court's own motion and pursuant to Rule 9(a) of this court the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied and the appeal is dismissed. In doing so, we note that this court is without jurisdiction to hear appeals made directly from the decision of United States Magistrates. See United States of America et al. v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678, and cases cited therein.

/544/f2d/934 · .json · Public domain