In re Exide Technologies’s Empirical Analysis
544 F.3d 196 · 2008
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Waldman v. Stone (2012), In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd. Litigation (2011)
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Pennsylvania Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1452 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg · Langenkamp v. Culp · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Coastal Steel Corporation v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd Wheelabrator-Frye Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) Core proceedings include, but are not limited to — (A) matters concerning the administration of the estate; (B) allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate or exemptions from property of the estate, and estimation of claims or interests for the purposes of confirming a plan under chapter 11, 12, or 13 of title 11 [11 USCS §§ 1101 et seq., 1201 et seq. or 1301 et seq.] but not the liquidation or estimation of contingent or unliquidated personal injury tort or wrongful death claims against the estate for purposes of distribution in a case under title 11; (C) counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against the estate; (D) orders in respect to obtaining credit; (E) orders to turn over property of the estate; (F) proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover preferences; (G) motions to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay; (H) proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover fraudulent conveyances; (I) determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts; (J) objections to discharges; (K) determinations of the validity, extent, or priority of liens; (L) confirmations of plans; (M) orders approving the use or lease of property, including the use of cash collateral; (N) orders approving the sale of property other than property resulting from claims brought by the estate against persons who have not filed claims against the estate; (0) other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-c”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The first three categories are ‘core’ proceedings in which the bankruptcy court has power to hear, decide, and enter orders and judgments. The fourth category, ‘related to’ proceedings, are ‘non-core’ proceedings, which the bankruptcy court can hear, but in which it can only submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court, not issue orders.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) it invokes a substantive right provided by title 11 or (2) if it is a proceeding, that by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.