Jamison v. Klem’s Empirical Analysis
544 F.3d 266 · 2008
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2024
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Williams v. Taylor · Hill v. Lockhart · Brady v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a full understanding of what the plea connotes and of its consequence.” Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 244 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); see also Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 755 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970) (requiring defendants to be informed of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We have steadfastly attempted to discourage District Courts as well as attorneys from relying on nonprecedential opinions of this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.