Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 F.3d 320 - Gray v. Evercore Restructuring L.L.C.

Gray v. Evercore Restructuring L.L.C.’s Empirical Analysis

544 F.3d 320 · 2008

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 34 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Grajales v. Puerto Rico Ports Authority (2012), Citibank Global Markets, Inc. v. Rodríguez Santana (2009)

13 federal appellate · 34 district · 1 state decisions

490200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner · Correa-Martinez v. Arrillaga-Belendez · Trans-Spec Truck Service, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc. · Palmer v. Champion Mortgage · Curran v. Cousins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the facts establishing that defense must: (1) be definitively ascertainable from the complaint and other allowable sources of information, and (2) suffice to establish the affirmative defense with certitude.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not constitute a motion to amend a complaint”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to establish a 'claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.