Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 F.3d 787 - In re Willett

In re Willett’s Empirical Analysis

544 F.3d 787 · 2008

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2022

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

110200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 11 U.S.C. § 1306 · 11 U.S.C. § 301 · 11 U.S.C. § 302 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass. · Village of San Jose v. McWilliams · Precision Industries, Inc. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC · Leon v. Comcar Industries Inc a · Domka v. Portage County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “acquired a different interest in the property at issue following initiation of the case.” Id. at 792, n. 4 (emphasis in original). 8 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.