Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

544 F. App'x 220

Lee v. Loranth

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2013

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2013-10-25

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2013-10-25

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Christopher Lee appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Loranth, No. 4:12-cv-02547-DCN, 2013 WL 2635843 (D.S.C. June 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 AFFIRMED.

/544/fappx/220 · .json · Public domain