Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 F. Supp. 370 - Budge v. Post

544 F. Supp. 370 - Budge v. Post’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2008

1 district · 1 state decisions

60198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Klapprott v. United States · Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi · Rozier v. Ford Motor Co. · Bankers Mortgage Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding, for the following reasons: ... (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party.... [t]he motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) not more than one year after judgment ... was taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) a judgment which ought not, in equity and good conscience, to be enforced; (2) a good defense to the alleged cause of action on which the judgment is founded; (3) fraud, accident, or mistake which prevented the defendant in the judgment from obtaining the benefit of his defense; (4) the absence of fault or negligence on the part of defendant; and (5) the absence of any adequate remedy at law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the consideration supporting the [ ] Settlement was neither expressly nor impliedly apportioned with respect to each promise made by the parties”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.