Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 N.E.2d 211 - Corl v. State

Corl v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 168 Ind. App. 674 - Rose v. State · 164 Ind. App. 693 - Bowlin v. State · Traxler v. State · Lilly v. State · Garland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There must be some direct or cireumstan-tial evidence to show the defendant operated the vehicle. There is no inference present in this case that [the defendant] operated his vehicle while intoxicated. Thus, the State has not satisfied the burden of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of operating his vehicle while intoxicated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a vehicle to support the conviction. The defendant was found asleep behind the wheel of his car, which was parked in the parking lot of a tavern with its lights on and engine running. The results of a breathalyzer test indicated the defendant's blood alcohol content was .14%. The conviction was reversed on appeal because”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[sfhowing that the defendant merely started the engine of the vehicle is not sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for operating a vehicle while intoxicated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.