Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 SE2D 249 - State v. Washington

State v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Odom · State v. Smith · State v. Earnhardt · United States v. McCaskill · State v. Vause

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Upon defendant's motion for dismissal, the question for the Court is whether there is substantial evidence (1) of each essential element of the offense charged, or of a lesser offense included therein, and (2) of the defendant's being the perpetrator of such offense. If so, the motion is properly denied."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) an assault; (2) with a deadly weapon; (3) with intent to kill; and (4) inflicting serious injury not resulting in death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Substantial evidence is `such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.