Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 So. 2d 22 - State v. Freeman

544 So. 2d 22 - State v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · 414 So. 2d 306 - State v. Fuller · Cromwell v. Commerce & Energy Bank of Lafayette · 446 So. 2d 1207 - State v. Camp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. The crime of obscenity is the intentional: * * * * * * (3) Sale, allocation, consignment, distribution, dissemination, advertisement, exhibition, or display of obscene material, or the preparation, manufacture, publication, or printing of obscene material for sale, allocation, consignment, distribution, advertisement, exhibition, or display. Obscene material is any tangible work or thing which the trier of fact determines (a) that the average person applying contemporary community standards would find, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, and (b) depicts or describes in a patently offensive way, hard core sexual conduct specifically defined in Paragraph (2) above, and (c) the work or thing taken as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.