Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 So. 2d 27 - State v. Falls

544 So. 2d 27 - State v. Falls’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thomas · 502 So. 2d 1098 - State v. Hancock · 339 So. 2d 10 - State v. Dupre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) to put the trial judge on notice of the alleged irregularity so that he may cure the problem, and (2) to prevent a defendant from gambling for a favorable verdict and then resorting to appeal on errors that might easily have been corrected by objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.