¶1This appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sentence as imposed. However, we note once again that court costs were imposed without notice to appellant and a judicial determination of her ability to pay. Such imposition of costs was erroneous despite the absence of a contemporaneous objection. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Ayers v. State, 538 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
544 So. 2d 350
544 So.2d 350
14 Fla.L.Weekly 1449
Clarke v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 16, 1989
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-06-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1989
1 state decisions
Relies on Anders v. California · 544 So. 2d 1004 - Wood v. State · 538 So. 2d 545 - Courtesy Corp. v. Holland
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1989-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →