Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 544 SO2D 606 - State v. Olive

State v. Olive’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sepulvado · Angrist v. United States · 408 So. 2d 1255 - State v. Dewey · 382 So. 2d 921 - State v. Ortego · 421 So. 2d 880 - State v. Hooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A law enforcement officer may stop a person in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is involved in criminal activity, including a traffic violation. La.C. Cr.P. art. 215.1(A). State v. Thibodeaux, 531 So.2d 284 (La.App. 3d Cir.1987); State v. Franklin, 511 So.2d 108 (La. App. 3d Cir.1987), writ denied, 514 So.2d 132 (La.1987). Considering Olive's observed dangerous driving, the stop was legal. The troopers then placed defendant under arrest and conducted a warrantless search of the car. The trial court found and we agree, that the circumstances gave the officers probable cause to search the car. The officers testified that they detected the odor of marijuana, not only on the defendant's person, but also a strong odor of drying marijuana in the car itself. This alone supports a finding of probable cause for a search. See State v. Garcia, 519 So.2d 788 (La. App. 1st Cir.1987), writ denied, 530 So.2d 85 (La.1988), and cases therein cited."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.