Steele v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · 278 So. 2d 384 - Glass v. State · Westbrook v. State · Pharr v. State · 481 So. 2d 793 - MacK v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is fundamental that convictions of crime cannot be sustained on proof which amounts to no more than a possibility or even when it amounts to a probability, but it must rise to the height which will exclude every reasonable doubt; that when in any essential respect the state relies on circumstantial evidence, it must be such as to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that the contention of the state is true, and that throughout the burden of proof is on the state. It is our duty here to maintain these principles.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“legally insufficient to establish anything more than a probability of guilty and did not `invest mere circumstances with the force of truth.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.