United States v. Milton J. Largent, United States of America v. Jonathon B. Higdon’s Empirical Analysis
545 F.2d 1039 · 1976
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently August 2008 · most notably United States v. Mahar (1986), United States v. Zelinka (1988)
50 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Marion · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Russell v. United States · Perez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, this evidence must be substantially similar and near in time to the offense charged, must be in issue, and must have more probative value than prejudicial impact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“tended to show a consistent pattern of conduct over the entire time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.