Singleton v. Gendason’s Empirical Analysis
545 F.2d 1224 · 1976
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2016
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3603 (§ 803 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (§ 804 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United States v. Dibble · D. C. Williams Et Ux. v. The Matthews Company · Zuch v. Hussey · Island Equipment Land Co. v. Guam Economic Development Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any single-family house sold or rented by an owner provided that such private individual does not own more than three such single-family homes at any one time ... if such house is sold or rented (A) without the use in any manner of the sales or rental facilities or the sales or rental services of any real estate broker, agent, or salesman, or of such facilities or services of any person in the business of selling or renting dwellings ... and (B) without the publication, posting or mailing, after notice, of any advertisement or written notice in violation of section 3604(c) of this title ...””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If [a single-family house owner] seeks the help of others who furnish any rental service for compensation, [the owner] ... forfeits his exemption.”). Nor does § 3603(b)(2) apply; assuming the apartment is a unit in a dwelling”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thurmond v. Bowman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.