King v. Sloane’s Empirical Analysis
545 F.2d 7 · 1976
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2022
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1341 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Perez v. Ledesma · Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Huffman · Lynch v. Household Finance Corp. · Matthews v. Rodgers · Dows v. City of Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By express statutory provision, Congress ... has directed that federal courts shall not enjoin or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under state law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The federal courts will not entertain actions for relief from State or local taxes unless federal rights are protected in no other way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.