United States v. Robin’s Empirical Analysis
545 F.2d 775 · 1976
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Vasquez (1980), United States v. Orozco-Prada (1984)
46 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. People of State of New York · United States v. Tucker · Townsend v. Burke · Gore v. United States · Dorszynski v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Misinformation or misunderstanding that is materially untrue regarding a pri- or criminal record, or material false assumptions as to any facts relevant to sentencing, renders the entire sentencing procedure invalid as a violation of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“permit that presentation by the defendant which will enable the sentencing judge to grasp the relevant facts correctly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.