Duffield v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
545 F.3d 1234 · 2008
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Gallagher v. Shelton (2009), Gardner v. Galetka (2009)
8 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Gregg v. Georgia · Ramos v. Lamm · United States v. Gonzalez-Huerta · Meade v. Grubbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the importance of the issues raised might trigger the interests of justice exception, we have said that, in many respects, the interests of justice analysis we have developed, which expressly includes review of a litigant’s unobjected-to substantive claims on the merits, is similar to reviewing for plain error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“firm waiver rule, ... [t]he failure to timely object to a magistrate's recommendations waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions.” Duffield v. Jackson, 545 F.3d 1234, 1237 (10th Cir.2008) (quotations, citation, and brackets omitted). The firm waiver rule applies to pro se litigants who, like Jacquez,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Individual liability under § 1983 must be based on personal involvement in the alleged constitutional violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.