United States v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis
545 F.3d 367 · 2008
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably United States v. Armel (2009), United States v. Williams (2010)
16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Booker · Gall v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Rita v. United States · United States v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the conduct and remarks of the prosecutor tended to mislead the jury or prejudice the defendant; (2) whether the conduct or remarks were isolated or extensive; (3) whether the remarks were deliberately or accidentally made; and (4) whether the evidence against the defendant was strong.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“seriously affect[ ] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“afford 'wide latitude to a prosecutor during closing argument.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.