Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 545 NE2D 1100 - Dayhuff v. State

Dayhuff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2011

10 state decisions

501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States · Palmer v. State · United States v. Hillsman · Smith v. State · Harrington v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct was compelled to do so by threat of imminent serious bodily injury to himself or another person. Compulsion exists only if the force, threat, or circumstance are such as would render a person of reasonable firmness incapable of resisting the pressure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A person other than a law enforcement officer is justified in using reasonable force against another person to effect an arrest or prevent another person’s escape if a felony has been committed and there is probable cause to believe the other person committed that felony.” Record at 62.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “As a general rule, a defendant in a criminal case is entitled to have the jury instructed on any theory of defense which has some foundation in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.