Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 545 SO2D 3 - Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1993
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 464 So. 2d 77 - Mhoon v. State · White v. State · 490 So. 2d 852 - Cabello v. State · Evans v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Physical objects which are relevant and for which the chain of custody is not broken or which are otherwise identified with certainty are admissible in evidence. (Citation omitted). Matters regarding the chain of custody of evidence are largely within the discretion of the trial court, and absent an abuse of discretion, this Court will not reverse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.