Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

545 So. 2d 506

545 So.2d 506

14 Fla.L.Weekly 1555

Vallejo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1989-06-29

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The petition does not allege, nor does the record show that the relief requested would entitle the appellant to immediate release.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 929 So. 2d 1155 - Ho v. State

Relies on 498 So. 2d 679 - Brown v. Wainwright · Williams v. State · 513 So. 2d 259 - Netherly v. Dugger

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-06-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2015

7 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GOSHORN, Judge.

¶1The appellant, Pedro Luis Vallejo appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition does not allege, nor does the record show that the relief requested would entitle the appellant to immediate release. See, Williams v. State, 519 So.2d 723 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Netherly v. Dugger, 513 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) and Brown v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 679 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Therefore, the trial court’s denial of the writ is AFFIRMED.

SHARP, C.J., and DANIEL, J., concur.
/545/so2d/506 · .json · Public domain