Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 545 SO2D 528 - State v. Manchester

State v. Manchester’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2016

17 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dixon · State v. McGraw · 414 So. 2d 1218 - State v. Thompson · State v. Manchester · State v. Manchester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The preferable procedure, in order to eliminate any misunderstanding such as the one which occurred here, is for the trial judge in a guilty plea colloquy to have any plea bargain stated in detail on the record or for counsel to make such an offer if the trial judge fails to require the statement. This procedure not only eliminates any misunderstanding between the court and the parties, but also insures the accuracy of the agreement in the event of future post-conviction applications based on unkept plea bargains. State v. Manchester, 545 So.2d at 528 n. 2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The trial judge, of course, had the discretion to reject the plea bargain, even if the parties had been in complete agreement as to the terms. However, the judge did not have discretion both to reject the bargain and to refuse to allow relator to withdraw her plea which was based on her reasonable belief that she would be sentenced in accordance with the bargain. (Citations omitted.) State v. Manchester, 545 So.2d at 529-530 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.