Crockett v. Dobbs’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1673
Relies on Lasseter v. Lasseter · Anderson v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to garnishment may not exceed (1) 25 percentum of his disposable earnings ... or (2) the amount by which his disposable earnings ... exceed thirty times the Federal minimum hourly wage ... whichever is less. [[Image here]] “... This subehapter does not annul, alter or affect, or exempt any person from complying with, the laws of any State (1) prohibiting garnishments or providing for more limited garnishments than are allowed under this subehapter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knight v. Knight
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.